:(str alist col co-channel state evisc) => (mv col state)
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
See fmt for further explanation.
The tilde-directives are ~px pretty print vx (maybe after printing a newline) ~qx pretty print vx starting in current column; end with newline ~Pxy like ~px but use vy as the evisceration tuple ~Qxy like ~qx but use vy as the evisceration tuple ~@x if vx is a string, "str", recursively format "str" if vx is ("str" . a), recursively format "str" under a+ ~#x~[...~/...~/ ... ~/...~] cases on vx ^ ^ ... ^ if 0<=vx<=k, choose vxth alternative 0 1 ... k if vx is a list of length 1, case 0; else 1 ~*x iterator: vx must be of the form ("str0" "str1" "str2" "str3" lst . a); if lst is initially empty, format "str0" under a+; otherwise, bind #\* successively to the elements of lst and then recursively format "stri" under a+, where i=1 if there is one element left to process, i=2 if there are two left, and i=3 otherwise. ~&x print elements of vx with ~p, separated by commas and a final ``and'' ~vx print elements of vx with ~p, separated by commas and a final ``or'' ~nx if vx is a small positive integer, print it as a word, e.g., seven; if vx is a singleton containing a small positive integer, print the corresponding ordinal as a word, e.g., seventh ~Nx like ~nx but the word is capitalized, e.g., Seven or Seventh ~tx tab out to column vx; newline first if at or past column vx ~cx vx is (n . w), print integer n right justified in field of width w ~fx print object vx flat over as many lines as necessary ~Fx same as ~f, except that subsequent lines are indented to start one character to the right of the first character printed ~sx if vx is a symbol, print vx, breaking on hyphens; if vx is a string, print the characters in it, breaking on hyphens ~ tilde space: print a space ~_x print vx spaces ~ tilde newline: skip following whitespace ~% output a newline ~| output a newline unless already on left margin ~~ print a tilde ~- if close to rightmargin, output a hyphen and newline; else skip this char
fourth member of the list
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
See any Common Lisp documentation for details.
the identity function
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Identity x)
equals x
; what else can we say?
Identity
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
if-then-else function
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(if x y z)
is equal to y
if x
is any value
other than nil
, and is equal to z
if x
is nil
.
Only one of x
, y
is evaluated when (if x y z)
is
evaluated.
If
has a guard of t
.
If
is part of Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp documentation for
more information.
logical ``if and only if''
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Iff
is the ACL2 biconditional, ``if and only if''. (iff P Q)
means that either P
and Q
are both false (i.e., nil
) or both true
(i.e., not nil
).
coerce to an integer
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Ifix
simply returns any integer argument unchanged, returning 0
on a non-integer argument. Also see nfix, see rfix, and
see fix for analogous functions that coerce to a natural
number, a rational number, and a number, respectively.
Ifix
has a guard of t
.
cause a hard error
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(illegal ctx str alist)
causes evaluation to halt with a short
message using the ``context'' ctx
. An error message is printed
using the string str
and alist alist
that are of the same kind
as expected by fmt
. See fmt.
imaginary part of a complex number
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Basic axiom:
(equal (imagpart x) (if (acl2-numberp x) (imagpart x) 0))
Guard for (imagpart x)
:
(acl2-numberp x)
logical implication
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Implies
is the ACL2 implication function. (implies P Q)
means
that either P
is false (i.e., nil
) or Q
is true (i.e., not nil
).
recognizer for improper (non-null-terminated) non-empty lists
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Improper-consp
is the function that checks whether its argument
is a non-empty list that ends in other than nil
.
See proper-consp and also see true-listp.
test equality of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(int= x y)
is logically equivalent to (equal x y)
.
Unlike equal
, int=
requires its arguments to be numbers (or
else causes a guard violation; see guard). Generally, int=
is executed more efficiently than equal
or =
on integers.
number of bits in two's complement integer representation
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
For non-negative integers, (integer-length i)
is the minimum number
of bits needed to represent the integer. Any integer can be
represented as a signed two's complement field with a minimum of
(+ (integer-length i) 1)
bits.
The guard for integer-length
requires its argument to be an
integer. Integer-length
is defined in Common Lisp. See any
Common Lisp documentation for more information.
recognizer for a true list of integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
The predicate integer-listp
tests whether its argument is a true
list of integers.
recognizer for whole numbers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(integerp x)
is true if and only if x
is an integer.
create a new symbol in a given package
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(intern symbol-name symbol-package-name)
returns a symbol with
the given symbol-name
and the given symbol-package-name
. We
restrict Common Lisp's intern
so that the second argument is
either the symbol *main-lisp-package-name*, the value of that
constant, or is one of "ACL2", "ACL2-INPUT-CHANNEL",
"ACL2-OUTPUT-CHANNEL", or "KEYWORD".
In ACL2 intern
is actually implemented as a macro that expands to
a call of a similar function whose second argument is a symbol.
Invoke :pe intern
to see the definition, or
see intern-in-package-of-symbol.
To see why is intern
so restricted consider
(intern "X" "P")
. In particular, is it a symbol and if so,
what is its symbol-package-name
? One is tempted to say ``yes, it
is a symbol in the package "P"
.'' But if package "P"
has
not yet been defined, that would be premature because the imports to
the package are unknown. For example, if "P"
were introduced
with
(defpkg "P" '(LISP::X))then in Common Lisp
(symbol-package-name (intern "X" "P"))
returns
"LISP"
.
The obvious restriction on intern
is that its second argument be
the name of a package known to ACL2. We cannot express such a
restriction (except, for example, by limiting it to those packages
known at some fixed time, as we do). Instead, we provide
intern-in-package-of-symbol
which requires a ``witness symbol''
for the package instead of the package. The witness symbol is any
symbol (expressible in ACL2) and uniquely specifies a package
necessarily known to ACL2.
create a symbol with a given name
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Basic axiom:
(equal (intern-in-package-of-symbol x y) (if (and (stringp x) (symbolp y)) (intern-in-package-of-symbol x y) nil))
Guard for (intern-in-package-of-symbol x y)
:
(and (stringp x) (symbolp y))
Intuitively, (intern-in-package-of-symbol x y)
creates a symbol
with symbol-name
x
interned in the package containing y
.
More precisely, suppose x
is a string, y
is a symbol with
symbol-package-name
pkg and that the defpkg
event creating pkg
had the list of symbols imports as the value of its second argument.
Then (intern-in-package-of-symbol x y)
returns a symbol, ans, the
symbol-name
of ans is x
, and the symbol-package-name
of ans
is pkg, unless x
is the symbol-name
of some member of imports
with symbol-package-name
ipkg, in which case the
symbol-package-name
of ans is ipkg. Because defpkg
requires
that there be no duplications among the symbol-name
s of the
imports, intern-in-package-of-symbol
is uniquely defined.
For example, suppose "MY-PKG"
was created by
(defpkg "MY-PKG" '(ACL2::ABC LISP::CAR)).Let
w
be 'my-pkg::witness
. Observe that
(symbolp w) is t ; w is a symbol (symbol-name w) is "WITNESS" ; w's name is "WITNESS" (symbol-package-name w) is "MY-PKG" ; w is in the package "MY-PKG"The construction of
w
illustrates one way to obtain a symbol in a given
package: write it down as a constant using the double-colon notation.
But another way to obtain a symbol in a given package is to create it with
intern-in-package-of-symbol
.
(intern-in-package-of-symbol "XYZ" w) is MY-PKG::XYZ(intern-in-package-of-symbol "ABC" w) is ACL2::ABC
(intern-in-package-of-symbol "CAR" w) is LISP::CAR
(intern-in-package-of-symbol "car" w) is MY-PKG::|car|
test whether two lists of symbols intersect
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
See intersectp-equal, which is logically the same function.
(Intersectp-eq x y)
has a guard that x
and y
are lists of
symbols.
test whether two lists intersect
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Intersectp-equal x y)
returns t
if x
and y
have a
member in common, else it returns nil.
Also
see intersectp-eq, which is logically the same but can be more
efficient since it uses eq
instead of equal
to look for
members common to the two given lists.
(Intersectp-equal x y)
has a guard that x
and y
are true lists.
input/output facilities in ACL2
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Example: (mv-let (channel state) (open-input-channel "foo.lisp" :object state) (mv-let (eofp obj state) (read-object channel state) (. . (let ((state (close-input-channel channel state))) (mv final-ans state))..)))Also see file-reading-example.
ACL2 supports input and output facilities equivalent to a subset
of those found in Common Lisp. ACL2 does not support random access
files or bidirectional streams. In Common Lisp, input and output
are to or from objects of type stream
. In ACL2, input and output
are to or from objects called ``channels,'' which are actually
symbols. Although a channel is a symbol, one may think of it
intuitively as corresponding to a Common Lisp stream. Channels are
in one of two ACL2 packages, "ACL2-INPUT-CHANNEL"
and
"ACL2-OUTPUT-CHANNEL"
. When one ``opens'' a file one gets back
a channel whose symbol-name
is the file name passed to ``open,''
postfixed with -n
, where n
is a counter that is incremented
every time an open or close occurs.
There are three channels which are open from the beginning and which cannot be closed:
acl2-input-channel::standard-character-input-0 acl2-input-channel::standard-object-input-0 acl2-input-channel::standard-character-output-0All three of these are really Common Lisp's
*standard-input*
or
*standard-output*
, appropriately.For convenience, three global variables are bound to these rather tedious channel names:
*standard-ci* *standard-oi* *standard-co*Common Lisp permits one to open a stream for several different kinds of
io
, e.g. character or byte. ACL2 permits an additional
type called ``object''. In ACL2 an ``io-type'' is a keyword, either
:character
, :byte
, or :object
. When one opens a file, one specifies
a type, which determines the kind of io operations that can be done
on the channel returned. The types :character
and :byte
are
familiar. Type :object
is an abstraction not found in Common Lisp.
An :object
file is a file of Lisp objects. One uses read-object
to
read from :object
files and print-object$
to print to :object
files.
(The reading and printing are really done with the Common Lisp read
and print
functions.)
File-names are strings. ACL2 does not support the Common Lisp type
pathname
.
Here are the signatures of the ACL2 io functions. See signature.
Input Functions: (open-input-channel (file-name io-type state) (mv channel state)) (open-input-channel-p (channel io-type state) boolean) (close-input-channel (channel state) state) (read-char$ (channel state) (mv char/nil state)) (peek-char$ (channel state) boolean) (read-byte$ (channel state) (mv byte/nil state)) (read-object (channel state) (mv eof-read-flg obj-read state))The ``formatting'' functions are particularly useful; see fmt.Output Functions: (open-output-channel (file-name io-type state) (mv channel state)) (open-output-channel-p (channel io-type state) boolean) (close-output-channel (channel state) state) (princ$ (obj channel state) state) (write-byte$ (byte channel state) state) (print-object$ (obj channel state) state) (fms (string alist channel state evisc-tuple) state) (fmt (string alist channel state evisc-tuple) (mv col state)) (fmt1 (string alist col channel state evisc-tuple) (mv col state))
When one enters ACL2 with (lp)
, input and output are taken from
*standard-oi*
to *standard-co*
. Because these are synonyms for
*standard-input*
and *standard-output*
, one can drive ACL2 io off of
arbitrary Common Lisp streams, bound to *standard-input*
and
*standard-output*
before entry to ACL2.
formals that are used but only insignificantly
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Let fn
be a function of n
arguments. Let x
be the i
th formal of fn
.
We say x
is ``irrelevant in fn
'' if x
is not involved in either the
guard or the measure for fn
, x
is used in the body, but the value of
(fn a1...ai...an)
is independent of ai
.
The easiest way to define a function with an irrelevant formal is simply not to use the formal in the guard, measure, or body of the function. Such formals are said to be ``ignored'' by Common Lisp and a special declaration is provided to allow ignored formals. ACL2 makes a distinction between ignored and irrelevant formals.
An example of an irrelevant formal is x
in the definition of fact
below.
(defun fact (i x) (declare (xargs :guard (and (integerp i) (<= 0 i)))) (if (zerop i) 0 (* i (fact (1- i) (cons i x))))).Observe that
x
is only used in recursive calls of fact
; it never
``gets out'' into the result. ACL2 can detect some irrelevant
formals by a closure analysis on how the formals are used. For
example, if the i
th formal is only used in the i
th argument position
of recursive calls, then it is irrelevant. This is how x
is used
above.
It is possible for a formal to appear only in recursive calls but
still be relevant. For example, x
is not irrelevant below, even
though it only appears in the recursive call.
(defun fn (i x) (if (zerop i) 0 (fn x (1- i))))The key observation above is that while
x
only appears in a
recursive call, it appears in an argument position, namely i
's, that
is relevant. (The function above can be admitted with a :
guard
requiring both arguments to be nonnegative integers and the :measure
(+ i x)
.)
Establishing that a formal is irrelevant, in the sense defined
above, can be an arbitrarily hard problem because it requires
theorem proving. For example, is x
irrelevant below?
(defun test (i j k x) (if (cond i j k) x 0))Note that the value of
(test i j k x)
is independent of x
-- thus
making x
irrelevant -- precisely if (cond i j k)
is a theorem.
ACL2's syntactic analysis of a definition does not guarantee to
notice all irrelevant formals.
We regard the presence of irrelevant formals as an indication that
something is wrong with the definition. We cause an error on such
definitions and suggest that you recode the definition so as to
eliminate the irrelevant formals. If you must have an irrelevant
formal, one way to ``trick'' ACL2 into accepting the definition,
without slowing down the execution of your function, is to use the
formal in an irrelevant way in the guard. For example, to admit
fact, above, with its irrelevant x
one might use
(defun fact (i x) (declare (xargs :guard (and (integerp i) (<= 0 i) (equal x x)))) (if (zerop i) 0 (* i (fact (1- i) (cons i x)))))For those who really want to turn off this feature, we have provided a way to use the
acl2-defaults-table
for this purpose;
see set-irrelevant-formals-ok.If you need to introduce a function with an irrelevant formal, please explain to the authors why this should be allowed.
recognizer for true lists whose even-position elements are keywords
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(keyword-value-listp l)
is true if and only if l
is a list of
even length of the form (k1 a1 k2 a2 ... kn an)
, where each ki
is a keyword.
recognizer for keywords
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Keywordp x)
is true if and only if x
is a keyword, i.e., a
symbol in the "KEYWORD" package. Such symbols are typically
printed using a colon (:) followed by the symbol-name
of the
symbol.
Keywordp
has a guard of t
.
Keywordp
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
the last cons
(not element) of a list
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Last l)
is the last cons
of a list. Here are examples.
ACL2 !>(last '(a b . c)) (B . C) ACL2 !>(last '(a b c)) (C)
(Last l)
has a guard of (listp l)
; thus, l
need not be a
true-listp
.
Last
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information. Unlike Common Lisp, we do not
allow an optional second argument for last
.
length of a string or proper list
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Length
is the function for determining the length of a sequence.
In ACL2, the argument is required to be either a true-listp
or a
string.
Length
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
binding of lexically scoped (local) variables
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Example LET Form: (let ((x (* x x)) (y (* 2 x))) (list x y))If the form above is executed in an environment in which
x
has the
value -2
, then the result is '(4 -4)
.
Let
expressions bind variables so that their ``local'' values, the
values they have when the ``body'' of the let
is evaluated, are
possibly different than their ``global'' values, the values they
have in the context in which the let
expression appears. In the let
expression above, the local variables bound by the let
are x
and y
.
They are locally bound to the values delivered by the two forms
(* x x)
and (* 2 x)
, respectively, that appear in the
``bindings'' of the let
. The body of the let
is (list x y)
.
Suppose that the let
expression above occurs in a context in which x
has the value -2
. (The global value of y
is irrelevant to this
example.) For example, one might imagine that the let
form above
occurs as the body of some function, fn
, with the formal parameter x
and we are evaluating (fn -2)
.
To evaluate the let
above in a context in which x
is -2
, we first
evaluate the two forms specifying the local values of the variables.
Thus, (* x x)
is evaluated and produces 4
(because x
is -2
) and
(* 2 x)
is evaluated and produces -4
(because x
is -2
).
Then x
and y
are bound to these values and the body of the let
is evaluated. Thus, when the body, (list x y)
is evaluated, x
is 4
and y
is -4
. Thus, the body produces '(4 -4)
.
Note that the binding of y
, which is written after the binding of x
and which mentions x
, nevertheless uses the global value of x
, not
the new local value. That is, the local variables of the let
are
bound ``in parallel'' rather than ``sequentially.'' In contrast, if
the
Example LET* Form: (let* ((x (* x x)) (y (* 2 x))) (list x y))is evaluated when the global value of
x
is -2
, then the result is
'(4 8)
, because the local value of y
is computed after x
has been
bound to 4
. Let*
binds its local variables ``sequentially.''
General LET Forms: (let ((var1 term1) ... (varn termn)) body) and (let ((var1 term1) ... (varn termn)) (declare ...) ... (declare ...) body)where the
vari
are distinct variables, the termi
are terms
involving only variables bound in the environment containing the
let
, and body
is a term involving only the vari
plus the variables
bound in the environment containing the let
. Each vari
must be used
in body
or else declared ignored.
A let
form is evaluated by first evaluating each of the termi
,
obtaining for each a vali
. Then, each vari
is bound to the
corresponding vali
and body
is evaluated.
Actually, let
forms are just abbreviations for certain uses of
lambda
notation. In particular
(let ((var1 term1) ... (varn termn)) (declare ...) body)is equivalent to
((lambda (var1 ... varn) (declare ...) body) term1 ... termn).
Let*
forms are used when it is desired to bind the vari
sequentially, i.e., when the local values of preceding varj
are to
be used in the computation of the local value for vari
.
General LET* Forms: (let* ((var1 term1) ... (varn termn)) body)where the
vari
are distinct variables, the termi
are terms
involving only variables bound in the environment containing the
let*
and those varj
such that j<i
, and body
is a term involving only
the vari
plus the variables bound in the environment containing the
let*
. Each vari
must be used in either some subsequent termj
or in
body. Note that let*
does not permit the inclusion of declare
forms.
The above let*
is equivalent to
(let ((var1 term1)) ... (let ((varn termn)) body)...)Thus, the
termi
are evaluated successively and after each
evaluation the corresponding vali
is bound to the value of termi
.
Each (vari termi)
pair in a let
or let*
form is called a ``binding''
of vari
and the vari
are called the ``local variables'' of the let
or let*
. The common use of let
and let*
is to save the values of
certain expressions (the termi
) so that they may be referenced
several times in the body without suggesting their recomputation.
Let
is part of Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp documentation
for more information.
binding of lexically scoped (local) variables
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
Example LET* Form: (let* ((x (* x x)) (y (* 2 x))) (list x y))If the form above is executed in an environment in which
x
has the
value -2
, then the result is '(4 8)
. See let for a discussion
of both let
and let*
, or read on for a briefer discussion.
The difference between let
and let*
is that the former binds its
local variables in parallel while the latter binds them
sequentially. Thus, in let*
, the term evaluated to produce the
local value of one of the locally bound variables is permitted to
reference any locally bound variable occurring earlier in the
binding list and the value so obtained is the newly computed local
value of that variable. See let.
Let*
is a Common Lisp macro. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
build a list
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
List
is the macro for building a list of objects. For example,
(list 5 6 7)
returns a list of length 3 whose elements are 5
,
6
, and 7
respectively. Also see list*.
List
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
build a list
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
List*
is the Common Lisp macro for building a list of objects from
given elements and a tail. For example, (list* 5 6 '(7 8 9))
equals
the list '(5 6 7 8 9)
. Also see list.
List*
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
recognizer for (not necessarily proper) lists
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(listp x)
is true when x
is either a cons
pair or is
nil
.
Listp
has no guard, i.e., its guard is t
.
Listp
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical `and' of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logand
returns their bitwise logical `and'.
The guard for logand
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logand
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical `and' of two ints, complementing the first
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logandc1
returns the bitwise logical `and' of the second with the
bitwise logical `not' of the first.
The guard for logandc1
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logandc1
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical `and' of two ints, complementing the second
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logandc2
returns the bitwise logical `and' of the first with the
bitwise logical `not' of the second.
The guard for logandc2
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logandc2
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
the i
th bit of an integer
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
For a nonnegative integer i
and an integer j
, (logbitp i j)
is the value of the i
th bit in the two's complement
representation of j
.
(Logbitp i j)
has a guard that i
is a nonnegative integer and
j
is an integer.
Logbitp
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
number of ``on'' bits in a two's complement number
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Logcount x)
is the number of ``on'' bits in the two's complement
representation of x
.
(Logcount x)
has a guard of (integerp x)
.
Logcount
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical equivalence of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logeqv
returns the bitwise logical equivalence of the first with
the second.
The guard for logeqv
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logeqv
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical inclusive or of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logior
returns their bitwise logical inclusive or.
The guard for logior
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logior
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical `nand' of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
lognand
returns their bitwise logical `nand'.
The guard for lognand
requires its arguments to be integers.
Lognand
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical `nor' of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
lognor
returns the bitwise logical `nor' of the first with the
second.
The guard for lognor
requires its arguments to be integers.
Lognor
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise not of a two's complement number
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(lognot i)
is the two's complement bitwise `not'
of the integer i
.
Lognot
is actually defined by coercing its argument to an integer
(see ifix), negating the result, and then subtracting 1
.
The guard for lognot
requires its argument to be an integer.
Lognot
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical inclusive or of two ints, complementing the first
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logorc1
returns the bitwise logical inclusive or of the second
with the bitwise logical `not' of the first.
The guard for logorc1
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logorc1
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical inclusive or of two ints, complementing the second
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logorc2
returns the bitwise logical inclusive or of the first
with the bitwise logical `not' of the second.
The guard for logorc2
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logorc2
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
test if two integers share a `1' bit
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers x
and y
are viewed in their two's complement
representation, (logtest x y)
is true if and only if there is
some position for which both x
and y
have a `1' bit in that
position.
The guard for logtest
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logtest
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
bitwise logical exclusive or of two integers
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
When integers are viewed in their two's complement representation,
logxor
returns the bitwise logical exclusive or of the first with
the second.
The guard for logxor
requires its arguments to be integers.
Logxor
is defined in Common Lisp. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.
recognizer for lower case characters
Parent topic: PROGRAMMING Home
(Lower-case-p x)
is true if and only if x
is a lower case
character, i.e., a member of the list #A
, #B
, ..., #Z
.
The guard for lower-case-p
requires its argument to be a character.
Lower-case-p
is a Common Lisp function. See any Common Lisp
documentation for more information.