book naming conventions assumed by ACL2
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
For this discussion we assume that the resident operating system is
Unix (trademark of AT&T), but analogous remarks apply to other
operating systems supported by ACL2, in particular, the Macintosh
operating system where `:
' plays roughly the role of `/
' in
Unix; see pathname.
ACL2 defines a ``full book name'' to be an ``absolute filename string,'' that may be divided into contiguous sections: a ``directory string'', a ``familiar name'' and an ``extension''. See pathname for the definitions of ``absolute,'' ``filename string,'' and other notions pertaining to naming files. Below we exhibit the three sections of one such string:
"/usr/home/smith/project/arith.lisp"The sections are marked by the rightmost slash and rightmost dot, as shown below."/usr/home/smith/project/" ; directory string "arith" ; familiar name ".lisp" ; extension
"/usr/home/smith/project/arith.lisp" | | slash dot | | "/usr/home/smith/project/" ; directory string "arith" ; familiar name ".lisp" ; extensionThe directory string includes (and terminates with) the rightmost slash. The extension includes (and starts with) the rightmost dot. The dot must be strictly to the right of the slash so that the familiar name is well-defined and nonempty.
If you are using ACL2 on a system in which file names do not have this form, please contact the authors and we'll see what we can do about generalizing ACL2's conventions.
how we know if include-book
read the correct files
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
The certificate (see certificate for general information) of a certified file is divided into two parts, a portcullis and a keep. These names come from castle lore. The keep is the strongest and usually tallest tower of a castle from which the entire courtyard can be surveyed by the defenders. The keep of a book is a list of file names and check sums used after the book has been included, to determine if the files read were (up to check sum) those certified.
Once the portcullis is open, include-book
can enter the book
and read the event forms therein. The non-local
event forms are
in fact executed, extending the host theory. That may read in other
books. When that has been finished, the keep of the
certificate is inspected. The keep is a list of the book names
which are included (heritarily through all subbooks) in the
certified book (including the certified book itself) together with
the check sums of the objects in those books at the time of
certification. We compare the check sums of the books just included
to the check sums of the books stored in the keep. If differences
are found then we know that the book or one of its subbooks has been
changed since certification.
See include-book to continue the guided tour through books.
introduction to filename conventions in ACL2
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
Although the notion of pathname objects from Common Lisp is not
supported in ACL2, nor is the function pathname
, nevertheless
ACL2 adopts conventions for naming files that are not so different
from Common Lisp's conventions, using strings that we'll call
``filename strings'' and (for ACL2 books) certain lists that we'll
call ``structured pathnames.'' Some of these strings and lists
correspond to ``absolute,'' i.e. complete, descriptions of a file or
directory; others are ``relative'' to the current working directory
or to the connected book directory (see cbd). The reason we
support structured pathnames is to allow books to be transferred
between machines running different operating systems
(see book-name).
Consider by way of introduction the following examples in the Unix (trademark of AT&T) operating system. The filename string
"/home/smith/acl2/book-1.lisp"corresponds to the structured pathname
(:absolute "home" "smith" "acl2" "book-1.lisp")and, relative to the connected book directory
"/home/smith/"
(see cbd), corresponds to the relative filename string
"acl2/book1.lisp"and to the relative structured pathname
(:relative "acl2" "book-1.lisp")The rest of the discussion focuses on filename strings vs. structured pathnames, with attention to directories vs. files and to absolute vs. relative pathnames.
Filename strings. One way to specify a file in ACL2 is by way
of a nonempty string. The form of this string must conform to the
requirements of the resident operating system. Thus in the Unix
environment, slash (/
) is the ``directory separator'': a
filename such as "/home/smith/acl2/book-1.lisp"
may be read as
``Inside the directory "/home",
then inside the directory
"smith",
then inside the directory "acl2"
, consider the
file "book-1.lisp"
.'' On the Macintosh, the directory
separator is colon (:
). Such strings represent a directory when
they terminate with the directory separator, and a file otherwise.
The directory separator may be obtained as:
(directory-separator (@ operating-system) 'top).Filename strings may be referred to either as absolute pathnames, which are complete descriptions of the location of a file or directory, or as relative pathnames, which give the location of a file or directory relative to a given (implicit) directory. In Unix, filename strings starting with the directory separator (
/
)
are absolute pathnames, such as the example in the preceding
paragraph. All other filename strings are relative pathnames.For example, the string
"examples/my-book"is a relative pathname. If the implicit directory (which for books is the connected book directory; see cbd) is
"/home/smith/"
, then the corresponding absolute pathname is the
filename string obtained by concatenating the implicit directory
with the relative pathname,
"/home/smith/examples/my-book"On the Macintosh the convention is exactly reversed: a string represents an absolute pathname exactly when its first character is not the directory separator (
:
). Thus, the absolute
pathname corresponding to the one displayed just above is
"home:smith:examples:my-book"which may be derived from the relative pathname
":examples:my-book"and implicit directory
"home:smith:"Notice that on the Macintosh, when we concatenate an implicit directory string to a relative pathname string, we must drop the excess colon, since a colon terminates the implicit directory string and also starts the relative pathname.
Structured pathnames. In ACL2, books may be named with
filename strings or with structured pathnames, which we now
describe. (Note that structured pathnames are only used in the
realm of books: for example, although :
set-cbd
accepts
structured pathnames, ld
currently only accepts filename
strings.) A structured pathname is a list beginning with one of the
keywords :absolute
or :relative
and then continuing with
strings, except that :back
may appear any number of times between
:relative
and the first string in the list. Each of the strings
represents a subdirectory, except that the last may represent a
file. For example, the filename string (in Unix)
"/home/smith/acl2/book-1.lisp"
represents the same file as does
the following structured pathname.
(:absolute "home" "smith" "acl2" "book-1.lisp")This is an absolute structured pathname, because it begins with the keyword
:absolute
. The other type of structured pathname is
the relative structured pathname, which begins with the keyword
:relative
. For example, the following structured pathname
corresponds to the relative filename string (in Unix)
"examples/my-book"
:
(:relative "examples" "my-book")As mentioned above, relative structured pathnames may also contain any number of occurrences of the keyword
:back
after the (initial
element) :relative
and before the first string. This keyword
represents the notion of going up one level in the file system (just
like ".."
in Unix). For example, suppose that the connected
book directory (see cbd) can be represented by the following
structured pathname.
(:absolute "home" "smith" "acl2" "examples")Then the structured pathname
(:relative :back :back "numbers" "book-2.lisp")represents the same file as does the following absolute structured pathname.
(:absolute "home" "smith" "numbers" "book-2.lisp")Here, the first
:back
may be thought of as ``cancelling'' the
subdirectory "examples"
and the second :back
may be thought
of as ``cancelling'' its parent "acl2"
, after which we are to
continue as specified by the given relative structured pathname.
There is no distinction between files and directories for structured
pathnames, but the intention is clear from context. For example,
the argument to :
set-cbd
is a directory, while the argument to
include-book
is a file (but without the ".lisp"
extension
(see book-name).
Finally, we note that our notion of structured pathname corresponds
to a similar notion of structured directory described in the second
edition of Guy Steele's book ``Common Lisp the Language.'' The main
difference is that we allow the trivial structured pathname
(:relative
), but Steele does not.
the gate guarding the entrance to a certified book
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
The certificate (see certificate for general information) of a
certified file is divided into two parts, a portcullis and a
keep. These names come from castle lore. The portcullis of a
castle is an iron grate that slides up through the ceiling of the
tunnel-like entrance. The portcullis of a book insures that
include-book
does not start to read the book until the
appropriate context has been created.
Technically, the portcullis is a pair containing a list of commands
used to create the ``certification world'' and an alist specifying
the check sums of all the books included in that world. The
portcullis is constructed automatically by certify-book
from the
world in which certify-book
is called, but that world
must have certain properties described below. After listing the
properties we discuss the issues more leisurely.
Each command in the portcullis must be either a defpkg
form or an
embedded event form (see embedded-event-form). In addition, we
exclude include-book
events unless the name of the included book
is an absolute filename (see pathname). For example, under
Unix (trademark of AT&T) any string supplied to include-book
in
the portcullis must begin with a slash (/
). Since the portcullis
commands are recovered automatically by certify-book
, this
restriction on the form of portcullis commands naturally
becomes a restriction on the world in which certify-book
may
be called. We explain the exclusion after discussing the general
issues.
Consider a book to be certified. The book is a file containing
event forms. Suppose the file contains references to such symbols
as my-pkg::fn
and acl2-arith::cancel
, but that the book itself
does not create the packages. Then a hard Lisp error would be
caused merely by the attempt to read the expressions in the book.
The corresponding defpkg
s cannot be written into the book itself
because the book must be compilable and Common Lisp compilers differ
on the rules concerning the inline definition of new packages. The
only safe course is to make all defpkg
s occur outside of compiled
files.
More generally, when a book is certified it is certified within some
logical world. That ``certification world'' contains not only
the necessary defpkg
s but also, perhaps, function and constant
definitions and maybe even references to other books. When
certify-book
creates the certificate for a file it recovers
from the certification world the commands used to create that
world from the initial ACL2 world. Those commands become
part of the portcullis for the certified book. In addition,
certify-book
records in the portcullis the check sums
(see check-sum) of all the books included in the certification
world.
Include-book
presumes that it is impossible even to read the
contents of a certified book unless the portcullis can be
``raised.'' To raise the portcullis we must be able to execute
(possibly redundantly, but certainly without error), all of the
commands in the portcullis and then verify that the books thus
included were identical to those used to build the certification
world (up to check sum). This raising of the portcullis must
be done delicately since defpkg
s are present: we cannot even read
a command in the portcullis until we have successfully executed the
previous ones, since packages are being defined.
Clearly, a book is most useful if it is certified in the most
elementary extension possible of the initial logic. If, for
example, your certification world happens to contain a
defpkg
for "MY-PKG"
and the function foo
, then those
definitions become part of the portcullis for the book. Every time
the book is included, those names will be defined and will have to
be either new or redundant (see redundant-events). But if
those names were not necessary to the certification of the book,
their presence would unnecessarily restrict the utility of the book.
Recall that we disallow include-book
events from the portcullis
unless the included book's name is an absolute filename
(See pathname). Thus, for example, under the Unix operating
system it is impossible to certify a book if the certification
world was created with
ACL2 !>(include-book "arith")The problem here is that the file actually read on behalf of such an
include-book
depends upon the then current setting of the
connected book directory (see cbd). That setting could be
changed before the certification occurs. If we were to copy
(include-book "arith")
into the portcullis of the book being
certified, there is no assurance that the "arith"
book included
would come from the correct directory. However, by requiring that
the include-book
s in the certification world give book names
that begin with slash we effectively require you to specify the full
file name of each book involved in creating your certification
world. Observe that the execution of
(include-book "/usr/local/src/acl2/library/arith")or equivalently (using structured pathnames; see pathname)
(include-book (:absolute "usr" "local" "src" "acl2" "library" "arith"))does not depend on the current book directory. On the other hand, this requirement -- effectively that absolute file names be used in the certification world -- means that a book that requires another book in its certification world will be rendered uncertified if the required book is removed to another directory. If possible, any
include-book
command required for a book ought
to be placed in the book itself and not in the certification
world. The only time this cannot be done is if the required
book is necessary to some defpkg
required by your book. Of
course, this is just the same advice we have been giving: keep the
certification world as elementary as possible.See keep to continue the guided tour of books.
to set the connected book directory
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
Example Forms: ACL2 !>:set-cbd "/usr/home/smith/" ACL2 !>:set-cbd (:absolute "usr" "home" "smith") ACL2 !>:set-cbd (:relative :back "smith")See cbd for a description of the connected book directory.
General Form: (set-cbd str)where
str
is either a nonempty string that represents the
absolute pathname for a directory, or a structured pathname that
represents a directory (see pathname). This command sets the
connected book directory (see cbd) to the string representing
the indicated directory. Thus, this command may determine which
files are processed by include-book
and certify-book
commands
typed at the top-level. However, the cbd
is also set by those two
book processing commands; thus, the setting of the cbd
is
irrelevant to include-book
commands in other books.
Note that if a structured pathname is used for :set-cbd
,
then it may be absolute or relative. (See pathname for
relevant definitions.) However, if a string is used for
:set-cbd
, it must represent an absolute pathname. We do not
support syntax for relative pathnames for use with :set-cbd
that is peculiar to particular operating systems, such as ".."
in Unix (trademark of AT&T), because we want to be sure to be able
to correctly identify the resulting absolute pathname of the
:
cbd
.
invalid certificates and uncertified books
Parent topic: BOOKS Home
Include-book
has a special provision for dealing with uncertified
books: If the file has no certificate or an invalid
certificate (i.e., one whose check sums describe files other
than the ones actually read), a warning is printed and the book is
otherwise processed as though it were certified and had an open
portcullis. (For details see books, see certificate,
and see portcullis.)
This can be handy, but it can have disastrous consequences.
The provision allowing uncertified books to be included can have disastrous consequences, ranging from hard lisp errors, to damaged memory, to quiet logical inconsistency.
It is possible for the inclusion of an uncertified book to render
the logic inconsistent. For example, one of its non-local
events
might be (defthm t-is-nil (equal t nil))
. It is also possible
for the inclusion of an uncertified book to cause hard errors or
breaks into raw Common Lisp. For example, if the file has been
edited since it was certified, it may contain too many open
parentheses, causing Lisp to read past ``end of file.'' Similarly,
it might contain non-ACL2 objects such as 3.1415
or ill-formed
event forms that cause ACL2 code to break.
Even if a book is perfectly well formed and could be certified (in a
suitable extension of ACL2's initial world), its uncertified
inclusion might cause Lisp errors or inconsistencies! For example,
it might mention packages that do not exist in the host world.
The portcullis of a certified book insures that the correct
defpkg
s have been admitted, but if a book is read without
actually raising its portcullis, symbols in the file, e.g.,
acl2-arithmetic::fn
, could cause ``unknown package'' errors in
Common Lisp. Perhaps the most subtle disaster occurs if the host
world does have a defpkg
for each package used in the book
but the host defpkg
imports different symbols than those required
by the portcullis. In this case, it is possible that formulas
which were theorems in the certified book are non-theorems in the
host world, but those formulas can be read without error and
will then be quietly assumed.
In short, if you include an uncertified book, all bets are off regarding the validity of the future behavior of ACL2.
That said, it should be noted that ACL2 is pretty tough and if errors don't occur, the chances are that deductions after the inclusion of an uncertified book are probably justified in the (possibly inconsistent) logical extension obtained by assuming the admissibility and validity of the definitions and conjectures in the book.